<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen says 53 to 47; union leaders in HoR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mumble.com.au/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813</link>
	<description>Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:23:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Brent</title>
		<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813&#038;cpage=1#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>Might as well have it ready, just in case ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might as well have it ready, just in case &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hills</title>
		<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813&#038;cpage=1#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>Peter,

Is it time for the Mike Rann political obits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>Is it time for the Mike Rann political obits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hills</title>
		<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813&#038;cpage=1#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>Finally confirmation that the hour of Sharran Burrow has arrived. Maybe she should be the candidate for Robertson?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally confirmation that the hour of Sharran Burrow has arrived. Maybe she should be the candidate for Robertson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Brent</title>
		<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813&#038;cpage=1#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>No JA, they reflect small sub-samples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No JA, they reflect small sub-samples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Anderson</title>
		<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813&#038;cpage=1#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>John Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>Peter, given recent polls and the general tightening reflected in them, do you think we are going to have a re-run of the 2007 election with the 2PP vote splitting about 53/47? Despite the media onslaught over the past fortnight, Labor&#039;s vote has held up quite well, ranging from 52% to 54% and back to 53% &amp; so on. Since November, there seems to be a settling down of support maybe because the Liberal leadership is settled &amp; disgruntled Liberals are coming home.

Thanks to the almighty Possum and like last time, I have had a look at Nielsen&#039;s demographic table. Support for Labor in the capital cities seems to be holding up very well [55% cf 56% last time] &amp; well above the national 2PP vote. City seats such as Macarthur &amp; even Roberston in NSW, Swan &amp; Hasluck in WA &amp; Dickson in QLD could be safe for Labor. While city LIB seats like Sturt, Bowman, McEwen &amp; Hughes look vulnerable.

But when you look at the state breakdowns, you have to wonder how accurate the poll is. Are teh results compatible with the city/rural split? With the exception of VIC [where ALP support is very steady], the other state voting intentions have lurched dramatically from one extreme to the other in a period of a month, particularly the primary votes. For example, in SA/NT, Labor&#039;s primary vote has fallen from 47% to 37% &amp; its 2PP share from 57% to 48%. QLD and WA have shown similar, violent swings but in NSW, Labor&#039;s support has grown over the past month. Do these dramatic swings reflect a sampling bias or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, given recent polls and the general tightening reflected in them, do you think we are going to have a re-run of the 2007 election with the 2PP vote splitting about 53/47? Despite the media onslaught over the past fortnight, Labor&#8217;s vote has held up quite well, ranging from 52% to 54% and back to 53% &amp; so on. Since November, there seems to be a settling down of support maybe because the Liberal leadership is settled &amp; disgruntled Liberals are coming home.</p>
<p>Thanks to the almighty Possum and like last time, I have had a look at Nielsen&#8217;s demographic table. Support for Labor in the capital cities seems to be holding up very well [55% cf 56% last time] &amp; well above the national 2PP vote. City seats such as Macarthur &amp; even Roberston in NSW, Swan &amp; Hasluck in WA &amp; Dickson in QLD could be safe for Labor. While city LIB seats like Sturt, Bowman, McEwen &amp; Hughes look vulnerable.</p>
<p>But when you look at the state breakdowns, you have to wonder how accurate the poll is. Are teh results compatible with the city/rural split? With the exception of VIC [where ALP support is very steady], the other state voting intentions have lurched dramatically from one extreme to the other in a period of a month, particularly the primary votes. For example, in SA/NT, Labor&#8217;s primary vote has fallen from 47% to 37% &amp; its 2PP share from 57% to 48%. QLD and WA have shown similar, violent swings but in NSW, Labor&#8217;s support has grown over the past month. Do these dramatic swings reflect a sampling bias or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rationalist</title>
		<link>http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813&#038;cpage=1#comment-2186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rationalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mumble.com.au/?p=1813#comment-2186</guid>
		<description>I loved the parody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
